A lot of research has been done on genetics which has created technologies that enable us to be able to view the genes of a child before it is born. Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and pre-implantation genetic screening (PGS) are used to create designer babies. Using these types of technology, genetic illnesses can be avoided and it helps to create healthy futures for those children. PGD is used with In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) and a cell can be removed from the embryo before it transfers back to the mother. The DNA in the cell can be analyzed for genetic errors such as Down syndrome, and then the embryo can be transferred back to the mother’s uterus. PGD makes it possible to detect genetic errors before the pregnancy is established. This is just one example of the many different technologies that have been developed from the extensive amount of research that has been done on genetic processes.
I think that when you are able to avoid genetic disorders like cystic fibrosis or muscular dystrophy, the research that was done on genetics is being put to good use. For example, someone with muscular dystrophy can be confined to a wheelchair by the time they are 12 which is very unfortunate. That child will not get to live life the way everyone else does so using technology to change those genes would be a positive thing. On the other hand, when this technology is used to choose genes for cosmetic reasons, it creates many social problems. I personally think choosing a child’s genes because you would rather have a tall child as suppose to be a short child is unnecessary. There are people that do not live past their first birthday because of a genetic disorder that they have so worrying about the little details of a child’s appearance is ridiculous. Most people were brought up believing that it is fine to be different and unique and it is, but designer babies completely go against that statement. I think using technology to choose genes for medical reasons is understandable but choosing genes for cosmetic reasons is pointless.
Sources
By, Park/New York, and Thompson/Washington. "Designer Babies - TIME." Breaking News, Analysis, Politics, Blogs, News Photos, Video, Tech Reviews - TIME.com. Web. 16 Nov. 2010. <http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,989987,00.html>.
Year, By. "PGD Technology Offers More Than Designer Babies." Medical News Today: Health News. 01 Apr. 2009. Web. 16 Nov. 2010. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/144448.php>.
"What Is a Designer Baby?" Bionet - New Discoveries in Life Sciences - Explore the Science and Debate the Issues. Web. 16 Nov. 2010. <http://www.bionetonline.org/english/content/db_cont1.htm>.I think that when you are able to avoid genetic disorders like cystic fibrosis or muscular dystrophy, the research that was done on genetics is being put to good use. For example, someone with muscular dystrophy can be confined to a wheelchair by the time they are 12 which is very unfortunate. That child will not get to live life the way everyone else does so using technology to change those genes would be a positive thing. On the other hand, when this technology is used to choose genes for cosmetic reasons, it creates many social problems. I personally think choosing a child’s genes because you would rather have a tall child as suppose to be a short child is unnecessary. There are people that do not live past their first birthday because of a genetic disorder that they have so worrying about the little details of a child’s appearance is ridiculous. Most people were brought up believing that it is fine to be different and unique and it is, but designer babies completely go against that statement. I think using technology to choose genes for medical reasons is understandable but choosing genes for cosmetic reasons is pointless.
Sources
By, Park/New York, and Thompson/Washington. "Designer Babies - TIME." Breaking News, Analysis, Politics, Blogs, News Photos, Video, Tech Reviews - TIME.com. Web. 16 Nov. 2010. <http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,989987,00.html>.
Year, By. "PGD Technology Offers More Than Designer Babies." Medical News Today: Health News. 01 Apr. 2009. Web. 16 Nov. 2010. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/144448.php>.
"Will Screening for Birth Defects Lead to 'designer Babies'?" Canada.com – Breaking News‚ Canada‚ World‚ Weather‚ Travel‚ Video & More. Web. 16 Nov. 2010. <http://www.canada.com/topics/lifestyle/parenting/story.html?id=af85fffa-81df-4c47-b389-d7eefc2faccf&k=7781>.
Blogs I Commented On
http://nicolesbioblog.blogspot.com/2010/11/designer-babies.html#comments
http://maeisdabomb.blogspot.com/2010/11/why-build-stuff-toy-when-you-can-build.html#comments
I never really took account of all the updated technology they have. It's really good that their trying to make the designer babies lives more enjoyable without the disease they would have received from their parents. I agree on what you said how some babies don't live to see their first birthday, yet parents are still worrying about the appearance of the child. It's unfortunate and really unnecessary of the parents to think like that. Great job, Carmina.
ReplyDeleteOh hey Carmina! I really enjoyed reading your post, it was very interesting! It's great how you pointed out all the technology they used today to make the futures more healthier for the children. It's so sad how some kids can't even live their lives because they're stuck in a wheel chair :( As a result, I very much agree on all this technology when it's put to good use! On the other hand however, it's very disappointing to see parents spend lots of money to change their child's look. All parents should be proud of their child any way they look. Excellent work, Carmina!
ReplyDeleteCarmina i think your right concerning when to have a designer baby. I think it should only be used when you know your kid will inherit a disorder. Doing this for cosmetic reasons is waste because you spend a lot of money for something you aren't sure of. By this i mean, you aren't sure of the outcome of how your child is going to be in the future. Your ideals will become imperfections as you said. Doing this for health purpose i think is fine even if it goes against humanity and morality.
ReplyDelete